Preface |
|
xxi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxiii | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (6) |
|
What This Course Is About |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Some Preliminary Thoughts Regarding the Social Objectives of Tort Law |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Measures of Recovery in Tort: The Rules Governing Damages |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Time Limitations on the Bringing of Tort Actions |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
How to Read an Appellate Decision |
|
|
5 | (2) |
chapter 1 Intentional Torts: Interference with Persons and Property |
|
7 | (50) |
|
|
7 | (12) |
|
|
7 | (6) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
19 | (8) |
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
|
27 | (3) |
|
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
|
30 | (8) |
|
Grant v. Stop-N-Go Market of Texas, Inc. |
|
|
31 | (5) |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
E. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress |
|
|
38 | (9) |
|
|
39 | (7) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Rogers v. Kent Board of County Road Commissioners |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
G. Trespass to Chattels and Conversion |
|
|
48 | (7) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc. |
|
|
50 | (5) |
|
H. An Umbrella Intentional Tort |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
chapter 2 Privileges/Defenses |
|
57 | (52) |
|
|
58 | (26) |
|
O'Brien v. Cunard Steamship Co. |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. |
|
|
61 | (5) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (5) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (4) |
|
|
84 | (6) |
|
|
84 | (5) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (5) |
|
|
91 | (5) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (5) |
|
Vincent v. Lake Erie Transp. Co. |
|
|
97 | (5) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
I. An Umbrella Justification Defense |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
Sindle v. New York City Transit Authority |
|
|
105 | (4) |
chapter 3 Negligence |
|
109 | (76) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
B. The General Standard of Care: Negligence Balancing |
|
|
110 | (12) |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
United States v. Carroll Towing Co. |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Washington v. Louisiana Power and Light Co. |
|
|
113 | (7) |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
C. The Qualities of the Reasonable Person |
|
|
122 | (28) |
|
1. What the Reasonable Person Knows |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
2. How the Reasonable Person Responds to Emergencies |
|
|
126 | (4) |
|
Cord as v. Peerless Transportation Co. |
|
|
126 | (4) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
3. Does the Reasonable Person Follow Customary Practice? |
|
|
130 | (4) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
4. The Physical and Mental Attributes of the Reasonable Person |
|
|
134 | (6) |
|
Roberts v. State of Louisiana |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (6) |
|
5. To What Standard of Conduct Is a Child Held? |
|
|
140 | (4) |
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
6. The Standard of Care for Professionals |
|
|
144 | (6) |
|
|
145 | (4) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
D. Judicially Determined Standards of Care |
|
|
150 | (19) |
|
1. Courts Utilizing Risk-Utility Balancing to Set Standards of Care |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
2. Courts Utilizing Statutes to Set Standards of Care: Negligence Per Se |
|
|
153 | (15) |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
Reque v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
Stachniewicz v. Mar-Cam Corporation |
|
|
160 | (5) |
|
Impson v. Structural Metals, Inc. |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
3. Statutory Private Rights of Action: Express or Implied |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
E. Proof of Negligence: Res Ipsa Loquitur |
|
|
169 | (16) |
|
|
170 | (6) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (5) |
|
|
181 | (4) |
chapter 4 Actual Causation |
|
185 | (46) |
|
A. But-for Causation: Did the Defendant's Negligent Conduct Cause the Plaintiff's Harm? |
|
|
185 | (9) |
|
Perkins v. Texas and New Orleans Ry. |
|
|
185 | (3) |
|
Ford v. Trident Fisheries Co |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Lyons v. Midnight Sun Transportation Services, Inc. |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
Reynolds v. Texas Pacific Ry. Co. |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
B. Special Problems of Proof |
|
|
194 | (19) |
|
Kramer Service, Inc. v. Wilkins |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
|
198 | (8) |
|
Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
207 | (6) |
|
C. When Two (or More) Negligent Actors Concurrently (or Successively) Cause the Plaintiff's Harm |
|
|
213 | (5) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
Kingston v. Chicago & N.W Ry. |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
D. When One of Several Negligent Actors Clearly Harmed the Plaintiff, but We Can't Tell Which One |
|
|
218 | (13) |
|
|
218 | (2) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories |
|
|
221 | (8) |
|
|
229 | (2) |
chapter 5 Proximate Causation |
|
231 | (62) |
|
A. Liability Limited to Reasonably Foreseeable Consequences |
|
|
232 | (29) |
|
|
232 | (5) |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
McCahill v. New York Transportation. Co. |
|
|
238 | (3) |
|
Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co. Ltd. (Wagon Mound No. 1) |
|
|
241 | (6) |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. The Miller Steamship Co. (Wagon Mound No. 2) |
|
|
247 | (4) |
|
Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. |
|
|
251 | (9) |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
|
261 | (19) |
|
Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp. |
|
|
261 | (6) |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
Watson v. Kentucky & Indiana Bridge & R.R. |
|
|
267 | (3) |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
|
271 | (5) |
|
Wagner v. International Railway |
|
|
276 | (4) |
|
C. Playing the "Duty" Card |
|
|
280 | (13) |
|
Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp. |
|
|
280 | (8) |
|
|
288 | (5) |
chapter 6 Nonliability for Foreseeable Consequences (Limited Duty Rules) |
|
293 | (74) |
|
A. Limitations on the Duty to Rescue |
|
|
293 | (25) |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
|
296 | (3) |
|
L. S. Ayres & Co. v. Hicks |
|
|
299 | (4) |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
|
303 | (5) |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California |
|
|
309 | (7) |
|
|
316 | (2) |
|
|
318 | (1) |
|
B. Limitations on Recovery for Pure Economic Loss |
|
|
318 | (18) |
|
State of Louisiana, Ex Rel. Guste v. M/V Testbank |
|
|
318 | (9) |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
|
327 | (2) |
|
People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp. |
|
|
329 | (5) |
|
|
334 | (2) |
|
C. Limitations on Recovery for Emotional Distress |
|
|
336 | (16) |
|
|
338 | (4) |
|
|
342 | (10) |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
D. Harm to Unborn Children |
|
|
352 | (15) |
|
|
353 | (5) |
|
Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo |
|
|
358 | (7) |
|
|
365 | (2) |
chapter 7 Owners and Occupiers of Land |
|
367 | (38) |
|
A. Duties Owed to Entrants on the Land |
|
|
368 | (17) |
|
1. Duties Owed to Trespassers |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
2. Duties Owed to Licensees |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
3. Duties Owed to Invitees |
|
|
369 | (4) |
|
Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority |
|
|
369 | (4) |
|
|
373 | (1) |
|
|
373 | (1) |
|
4. Rejection of the Categories |
|
|
373 | (7) |
|
|
374 | (6) |
|
|
380 | (5) |
|
|
380 | (4) |
|
|
384 | (1) |
|
B. Special Rules Limiting Liability |
|
|
385 | (3) |
|
1. The Firefighter's Rule |
|
|
385 | (2) |
|
2. Recreational Use Statutes |
|
|
387 | (1) |
|
C. Duties Owed to Those Outside the Premises |
|
|
388 | (3) |
|
|
389 | (2) |
|
D. Duties Owed by Lessors |
|
|
391 | (5) |
|
|
392 | (4) |
|
E. Premises Liability: Securing Against Crime |
|
|
396 | (9) |
|
Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
|
|
396 | (9) |
chapter 8 Affirmative Defenses |
|
405 | (58) |
|
A. Defenses Based on Plaintiff's Conduct |
|
|
405 | (38) |
|
1. Contributory Negligence |
|
|
405 | (3) |
|
|
405 | (3) |
|
2. Comparative Negligence |
|
|
408 | (13) |
|
|
408 | (6) |
|
|
414 | (3) |
|
Alami v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. |
|
|
417 | (4) |
|
|
421 | (16) |
|
Jorst v. D'Ambrosio Bros. Investment Co. |
|
|
422 | (6) |
|
|
428 | (3) |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
|
432 | (5) |
|
4. Avoidable Consequences |
|
|
437 | (6) |
|
|
438 | (4000) |
|
|
4438 | |
|
B. Non-Conduct-Based Defenses |
|
|
443 | (20) |
|
|
443 | (16) |
|
|
446 | (6) |
|
|
452 | (7) |
|
|
459 | (1) |
|
2. Statutes of Limitation |
|
|
459 | (3) |
|
|
462 | (1) |
chapter 9 Joint Tortfeasors |
|
463 | (24) |
|
|
463 | (3) |
|
|
463 | (3) |
|
B. Liability by Operation of Law |
|
|
466 | (1) |
|
|
466 | (10) |
|
American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County |
|
|
466 | (6) |
|
|
472 | (4) |
|
D. Satisfaction of a Judgment and the Aftermath: Contribution and Indemnity |
|
|
476 | (2) |
|
E. Settlement and Release |
|
|
478 | (2) |
|
F. Where the Issue of Divisibility of Damages Is Unclear |
|
|
480 | (7) |
|
Michie v. Great Lakes Steel Division, National Steel Corp. |
|
|
481 | (3) |
|
Dillon v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co. |
|
|
484 | (3) |
chapter 10 Strict Liability |
|
487 | (26) |
|
|
488 | (5) |
|
|
490 | (2) |
|
|
492 | (1) |
|
B. Abnormally Dangerous Activities |
|
|
493 | (20) |
|
|
493 | (3) |
|
|
496 | (1) |
|
Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co. |
|
|
497 | (3) |
|
|
500 | (1) |
|
Indiana Harbor Belt R.R. v. American Cyanamid Co. |
|
|
500 | (7) |
|
Foster v. Preston Mill Co. |
|
|
507 | (1) |
|
|
508 | (5) |
chapter 11 Products Liability |
|
513 | (68) |
|
A. In the Beginning There Was Privity: The Negligence Action |
|
|
513 | (2) |
|
B. The Implied Warranty of Merchantability: The Contract Action |
|
|
515 | (1) |
|
C. Strict Liability: Combining Contract and Tort |
|
|
515 | (3) |
|
D. The Hard Work: Defining and Proving Defect |
|
|
518 | (46) |
|
|
519 | (3) |
|
Welge v. Planters Lifesavers Co. |
|
|
519 | (3) |
|
|
522 | (34) |
|
Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co. |
|
|
524 | (6) |
|
Vautour v. Body Masters Sports Industries, Inc. |
|
|
530 | (5) |
|
Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. |
|
|
535 | (6) |
|
|
541 | (1) |
|
|
542 | (1) |
|
Soule v. General Motors Corp. |
|
|
542 | (7) |
|
|
549 | (7) |
|
|
556 | (8) |
|
Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. |
|
|
556 | (6) |
|
|
562 | (1) |
|
|
563 | (1) |
|
|
564 | (4) |
|
Union Pump Co. V. Allbritton |
|
|
564 | (4) |
|
|
568 | (6) |
|
Murray v. Fairbanks Morse |
|
|
568 | (6) |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
G. Express Warranty and Misrepresentation |
|
|
574 | (7) |
|
|
575 | (6) |
chapter 12 Trespass to Land and Nuisance |
|
581 | (28) |
|
A. An Introduction to the Basics |
|
|
581 | (1) |
|
B. Trespass in Shades of Gray |
|
|
582 | (5) |
|
Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co. |
|
|
582 | (5) |
|
|
587 | (10) |
|
Hughes v. Emerald Mines Corp. |
|
|
587 | (4) |
|
Carpenter v. The Double R Cattle Co., Inc. |
|
|
591 | (6) |
|
|
597 | (1) |
|
E. The Coase Theorem: Understanding Nuisance Through the Prism of Economics |
|
|
598 | (2) |
|
|
600 | (9) |
|
Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co., Inc. |
|
|
600 | (6) |
|
|
606 | (3) |
chapter 13 Damages |
|
609 | (64) |
|
|
609 | (42) |
|
1. Damages for Personal Injury |
|
|
610 | (29) |
|
Anderson v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. |
|
|
610 | (3) |
|
|
613 | (7) |
|
|
620 | (9) |
|
|
629 | (6) |
|
|
635 | (4) |
|
|
639 | (3) |
|
3. Wrongful Death and Survival |
|
|
642 | (9) |
|
Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. Garris |
|
|
642 | (4) |
|
|
646 | (5) |
|
|
651 | (22) |
|
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia |
|
|
654 | (5) |
|
BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore |
|
|
659 | (8) |
|
Price v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. |
|
|
667 | (6) |
chapter 14 Compensation Systems as Alternatives to Tort |
|
673 | (48) |
|
|
675 | (10) |
|
Anderson v. Save-A-Lot, Ltd. |
|
|
678 | (7) |
|
B. Automobile No-Fault Insurance Plans |
|
|
685 | (10) |
|
McKenzie v. Auto Club Insurance Assn. |
|
|
686 | (9) |
|
C. Other Forms of No-Fault Compensation |
|
|
695 | (17) |
|
1. Replacing the Tort System Entirely: The New Zealand Experience |
|
|
695 | (10) |
|
Richard S. Miller, An Analysis and Critique of the 1992 Changes to New Zealand's Accident Compensation Scheme |
|
|
697 | (2) |
|
Rt. Hon. Sir Geoffrey Palmer, New Zealand's Accident Compensation Scheme: Twenty Years On |
|
|
699 | (3) |
|
Bryce Wilkinson, New Zealand's Failed Experiment with State Monopoly Accident Insurance |
|
|
702 | (3) |
|
2. Federal No-Fault Compensation Programs in the U.S. |
|
|
705 | (2) |
|
3. No-Fault Compensation for Medical Accidents |
|
|
707 | (5) |
|
James A. Henderson, Jr., The Boundary Problems of Enterprise Liability |
|
|
707 | (5) |
|
D. The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund |
|
|
712 | (9) |
|
David W. Chen, Family of 9/11 Victim Accepts $1.04 Million in the First U.S. Payout |
|
|
718 | (3) |
chapter 15 Defamation |
|
721 | (70) |
|
|
721 | (1) |
|
|
722 | (3) |
|
Grant v. Reader's Digest Assn. |
|
|
722 | (3) |
|
C. The Form of Communication-Libel and Slander |
|
|
725 | (1) |
|
|
726 | (6) |
|
Janklow v. Newsweek, Inc. |
|
|
726 | (6) |
|
E. Communicating the Defamation to Others-Publication |
|
|
732 | (7) |
|
Van-Go Transport Co., Inc. v. New York City Board of Education |
|
|
732 | (7) |
|
F. Did the Arrow Hit the Target? Of and Concerning the Plaintiff |
|
|
739 | (4) |
|
|
739 | (4) |
|
G. The Constitution and the Law of Defamation |
|
|
743 | (39) |
|
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan |
|
|
743 | (12) |
|
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. |
|
|
755 | (9) |
|
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. |
|
|
764 | (7) |
|
Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps |
|
|
771 | (3) |
|
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. |
|
|
774 | (8) |
|
H. Privileges After the Constitutional Takeover |
|
|
782 | (9) |
|
1. Qualified Privileges at Common Law? |
|
|
783 | (4) |
|
Erickson v. Marsh & McLennan Co., Inc. |
|
|
783 | (4) |
|
2. Absolute Privileges at Common Law |
|
|
787 | (5) |
|
|
788 | (3) |
chapter 16 Privacy |
|
791 | (34) |
|
A. Appropriation of the Plaintiff's Likeness for the Defendant's Advantage |
|
|
792 | (14) |
|
Carson v. Here's Johnny Portable Toilets, Inc. |
|
|
794 | (8) |
|
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. |
|
|
802 | (4) |
|
B. Public Disclosure of Embarrassing Private Facts About Plaintiff |
|
|
806 | (8) |
|
|
806 | (3) |
|
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn |
|
|
809 | (5) |
|
C. Placing the Plaintiff in a False Light |
|
|
814 | (5) |
|
|
814 | (5) |
|
D. Intrusion Upon the Plaintiff's Solitude |
|
|
819 | (6) |
|
Nader v. General Motors Corporation |
|
|
819 | (3) |
|
|
822 | (3) |
Table of Cases |
|
825 | (12) |
Table of Statutes |
|
837 | (6) |
Index |
|
843 | |