Summary
Film noir is a classic genre characterized by visual elements such as tilted camera angles, skewed scene compositions, and an interplay between darkness and light. Common motifs include crime and punishment, the upheaval of traditional moral values, and a pessimistic stance on the meaning of life and on the place of humankind in the universe. Spanning the 1940s and 1950s, the classic film noir era saw the release of many of Hollywood's best-loved studies of shady characters and shadowy underworlds, including Double Indemnity, The Big Sleep, Touch of Evil, and The Maltese Falcon. Neo-noir is a somewhat loosely defined genre of films produced after the classic noir era that display the visual or thematic hallmarks of the noir sensibility. The essays collected in The Philosophy of Neo-Noir explore the philosophical implications of neo-noir touchstones such as Blade Runner, Chinatown, Reservoir Dogs, Memento, and the films of the Coen brothers. Through the lens of philosophy, Mark T. Conard and the contributors examine previously obscure layers of meaning in these challenging films. The contributors also consider these neo-noir films as a means of addressing philosophical questions about guilt, redemption, the essence of human nature, and problems of knowledge, memory and identity. In the neo-noir universe, the lines between right and wrong and good and evil are blurred, and the detective and the criminal frequently mirror each other's most debilitating personality traits. The neo-noir detective -- more antihero than hero -- is frequently a morally compromised and spiritually shaken individual whose pursuit of a criminal masks the search for lost or unattainable aspects of the self. Conard argues that the films discussed in The Philosophy of Neo-Noir convey ambiguity, disillusionment, and disorientation more effectively than even the most iconic films of the classic noir era. Able to self-consciously draw upon noir conventions and simultaneously subvert them, neo-noir directors push beyond the earlier genre's limitations and open new paths of cinematic and philosophical exploration.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments |
|
vii | |
Introduction |
|
1 | |
Part 1: Subjectivity, Knowledge, and Human Nature in Neo-Noir |
|
|
Space, Time, and Subjectivity in Neo-Noir Cinema |
|
|
7 | |
|
|
|
Blade Runner and Sartre: The Boundaries of Humanity |
|
|
21 | |
|
|
|
John Locke, Personal Identity, and Memento |
|
|
35 | |
|
|
|
Problems of Memory and Identity in Neo-Noir's Existentialist Antihero |
|
|
47 | |
|
|
Part 2: Justice, Guilt, and Redemption: Morality in Neo-Noir |
|
|
The Murder of Moral Idealism: Kant and the Death of Ian Campbell in The Onion Field |
|
|
67 | |
|
|
|
Justice and Moral Corruption in A Simple Plan |
|
|
83 | |
|
|
|
"Saint" Sydney: Atonement and Moral Inversion in Hard Eight |
|
|
91 | |
|
Donald R. D'Aries and Foster Hirsch |
|
|
|
Reservoir Dogs: Redemption in a Postmodern World |
|
|
101 | |
|
|
Part 3: Elements of Neo-Noir |
|
|
The Dark Sublimity of Chinatown |
|
|
119 | |
|
|
|
The Human Comedy Perpetuates Itself: Nihilism and Comedy in Coen Neo-Noir |
|
|
137 | |
|
|
|
The New Sincerity of Neo-Noir: The Example of The Man Who Wasn't There |
|
|
151 | |
|
|
|
"Anything Is Possible Here": Capitalism, Neo-Noir, and Chinatown |
|
|
167 | |
|
Jeanne Schuler and Patrick Murray |
|
|
|
Sunshine Noir: Postmodernism and Miami Vice |
|
|
183 | |
|
|
Contributors |
|
203 | |
Index |
|
207 | |